JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)November 5, 2003

A- de 2003

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Clara Inés Vargas Hernández

✓Claimant Alberto Vergara Molano

✓
Topic · hard data
Conflicto De Competencia. Corte Suprema De Justicia.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Decreto Reglamentario De Competencia Para Reparto De Accion De Tutela
  • Inaplicación
  • Inaplicación para el caso cuando el demandado es el Consejo Superior de la Judicatura
2 topics · 3 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Se remitió el expediente a la Oficina Judicial de Bogotá para que lo reparta al Tribunal Superior del Distrito Judicial de Bogotá o al Tribunal Administrativo de Cundinamarca, de manera que la autoridad respectiva adelante la correspondiente actuación judicial.

Lo anterior, de acuerdo a la regla general prevista en el Art. 37 del Decreto 2591 de 1991 y al Art. 1, numeral 1 del Decreto 1382 de 2000.

De donde resulta que en las actuales circunstancias, la competencia para conocer de las acciones de tutela interpuestas contra autoridades públicas del orden nacional, le corresponde a los Tribunales Superiores de Distrito Judicial, Administrativos y Concejos Seccionales de la Judicatura.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. RESUELVE:
  2. REMITIR el expediente a la Oficina Judicial de Bogota, para que ella lo reparta al Tribunal Superior del Distrito Judicial de Bogota o al Tribunal Administrativo de Cundinamarca, para que la autoridad respectiva adelante la correspondiente actuacion judicial.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Separate opinions — text available1
DissentJaime Araujo Rentería
Official text from the case-law reporter · the most valuable part of the ruling: the positions that did not carry the majority.
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.